|
Response Details:
| PROPOSAL - 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Calculating Net Present Value (NPV): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Cashflows
|
PV factor at 10%
|
Net Present Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
($5,000)
|
1
|
($5,000.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
$2,000
|
0.9091
|
$1,818.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
$3,000
|
0.8264
|
$2,479.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
$4,000
|
0.7513
|
$3,005.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
$3,000
|
0.6830
|
$2,049.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present Value
|
$4,351.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PROPOSAL - 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Calculating Net Present Value (NPV): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Cashflows
|
PV factor at 10%
|
Net Present Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
($3,000)
|
1
|
($3,000.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
$1,000
|
0.9091
|
$909.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
$1,000
|
0.8264
|
$826.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
$1,000
|
0.7513
|
$751.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
$1,000
|
0.6830
|
$683.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present Value
|
$169.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Cashflows
|
PV factor at 10%
|
Net Present Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
($2,000)
|
1
|
($2,000.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
$2,000
|
0.9091
|
$1,818.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
$2,000
|
0.8264
|
$1,652.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
$2,000
|
0.7513
|
$1,502.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
$2,000
|
0.6830
|
$1,366.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present Value
|
$4,339.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total NPV = $169.80 + $4,339.60 = $4,509.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Note: Proposal - 1 NPV = $4,351.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Proposal - 2 NPV = $4,509.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparing these two Proposals, Proposal - 2 has highest Net Present Value. Thus,he is better to preferr Proposal - 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|